SHAFAQAT ALI versus MALIK MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Sections 12 and 39 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 41 of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VH, Rr 1 (g), 7 and 8, the specific performance of the sale agreement, The suit for claiming the cancellation of the registered sale deed in favor of the buyer was not subsequently claimed, but the plaintiff's legal position was emphasized and the cost of the sale was obtained by the seller from the claimant. The relationship between the buyer and the seller was of a real uncle and nephew, while the buyer's brother then married the seller's daughter, after which the buyer's presence became a matter of progress. Ai was favored and the buyer was then a close relative and lived in a small area, thus the transaction was done in his uncle's house. Cannot remain invisible in favor of the claimant Subsequent purchasers cannot claim clear buyer protection, consequently the purchase is fraudulent and suits to defeat the rights of the claimant arising from a valid sale agreement. Was terminated while in the registered sale deed, conditions were subsequently canceled in favor of the buyer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer