Find a Lawyer

ZAHID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) of the evidence appreciation was filed at the police station within a short period of 1 1/2 hours, allowing any The possibility was eliminated. Prior to the registration of the same ocular account of the prosecution version provided by the prosecution's witnesses, the inquiry or inquiry was fully confirmed by medical evidence; both the accused were arrested on the spot while investigating the injured. The officer had recovered the pistol from the accused, persons and two crime cases were empty. Also recovered on occasion and three other properties were also recovered from the spot. The report of the Franzic Science Laboratory was effective in that the spaces were matched with the pistols of the accused. The site's plan cannot be contradicted by the prosecution's version and there is no medical evidence or contradiction. One of the suspected person was arrested on the spot and recovered 30 bore pistols and the rim amulets extracted from the pistol were also seized from the scene, which shows that the accused had been arrested in the incident. Although there was no witness associated with it, the incident was a public place, but due to lack of civilian sense, people generally did not have the courage to go against a crime. Do not become witnesses nor do they want to indulge in activities that result in problems with inquiries / trials. The police's evidence was as dependable as any other independent witness's prosecution had proved. For his retreat and counsel, because the same was given to the accused by the trial court best law firm from Kallat lawyer