Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

The definitions of FLR evidence were promptly recorded in the Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337a (I), (I) case, and such FIRs were diverted to post-mortem evidence in ocular accounts. Can be used as fragments. The body of the deceased was brought into action without delay. From all the facts it was known that the incident took place at a certain time and the witnesses of the complainant and the other prosecution were real brothers of the deceased, but the mere relationship and relations with the deceased were not sufficient to make them interesting witness. There was no enmity between the parties before, nor was there any motive for engaging the false accused in the matter. The incident was in the light of day, and the parties first knew each other, which eliminated the possibility of the accused being abusive. The participant who was actually participated in the incident said both witnesses agreed on the time, location and method of the incident. During the incident, the complainant, along with the role of the two accused, presented a fuzzy explanation for the presence of the accused; the instant registration of the FLR confirmed the presence of the complainant, The possibility of confession of the story was eliminated, the presence of the other eye was also fully established on the occasion when he received eight injuries to the person being observed by the doctor when he was examined for medical examination. The prosecution's witnesses on the occasion said that witnesses' statements made the evidence dependable. One prominent case was the worst case of the co-accused because the investigation attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gojra lawyer