MUHAMMD IDREES RABBANI versus STATE
Section 295 C&295 testimony was filed after a delay of one day after consulting 15 persons No one wrote that the accused was sufficient to appoint the accused as a writer by filing a Handwriting Expert Report. was not. The aforementioned retail prosecution has failed to prove on the record that where, where and in whom the documents against the accused were prepared, which stated that the witnesses against the accused were confessed by different sects, The prosecution's witnesses contradicted the way they handled each other. The leaflets are handed over to them and then they are handed over to the police by them. No documents were seized from the accused prosecutions, according to witnesses, because of their disagreement with different views about the Islamic teachings. No independent evidence was brought on the record to show that the accused was fond of M, arguing and propagating his views to other people and thereby suppressing his feelings. The prosecution's witnesses had reportedly opened the case with the suspect about his conviction, but the accused never followed them to convince them of his conviction. The hut, he could not say no to hurt the feelings of others, the repeated judicial confession of the accused could not be the basis of his conviction, as he was not listed with proper care and caution. He was left with the police alleging that they had denied the allegations during the court proceedings and
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Landi Kotal lawyer