Find a Lawyer

SHANA versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Sections 161 and 162 of Law Evidence (10 10 1984), Article 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Establishment to hide the facts, respondents filed a petition for division of the common share of the respondents, after which the petitioner / assistant collector. Approved. On request of the petitioners as requested and distributed by the parties, the petitioner filed an appeal against the order of the Tehsildar / Assistant Collector after dissatisfaction with the map distribution, after which, the District Collector Petitioner concealed his dismissal. Were dismissed. Another appeal was filed before the Collector / DO (R) in the appeal, then under the provisions of Section 161, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the collector / DO (legal) law Inspect or otherwise check the order approved by it. The petitioner / assistant collector filed the petition filed by the petitioners only once before the facts were not valid. The earlier order passed in the appeal was challenged and the question was quashed. It was no longer challenged; the final position was obtained. The courts correctly denied interference in the circumstances. There was no case for interference with the constitutional jurisdiction. This is how the High Court was made Pakistan, top advocate family court from Choppar Hatta lawyer