Find a Lawyer

ASIF WASEEM versus STATE

The accused accused of appreciating the Articles 302, 324 and 449 were neither named in the FIR nor were the prosecution witnesses named in their statements under section 161; all the PCP witnesses were the first accused Was named when his statements were recorded before the trial court. Also attributed to the fugitives and other accomplices who were acquitted, an identity parade was never held to establish the identity of the accused; Because of all the prosecution witnesses replaced the accused as a co-accused, who was also tried to play the role of co-accused, the accused was accused of making statements of witnesses, their evidence Denied in these circumstances, the confessional statement filed by the magistrate, relied upon by the accused during the trial. Can't be done. Such judicial confession did not affect the recovery of the pistol. During the course of the trial, no vacant opportunity was recovered and no witnesses were involved in the retrieval proceedings, the prosecution said. I did not find any evidence against the accused. After being held to the extent of the accused, he was acquitted of all charges and was released top advocates from Kandhkot lawyer