Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE

Definitions of Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) evidence, reduction of 7/8 hours delay in recording the complainant's statement after the incident is not explained, delay of the deceased to indicate post mortem It was sufficient that the FIR was not registered at the time of receipt. Such an FIR cannot be used as a disputed piece of evidence. An unidentified person, but then the police provoked provocation, saying that the victim's presence at the scene of the incident was not made a call after the complainant's presence and a story was not made in court. The reason for this was not proven. Despite the contradictory statements made by the complainant being a densely populated area, no one from the area was involved in the recovery proceedings, as witnesses have said that the prosecution was not credible, so it The accused, accused of killing his wife at his wife's grave, had failed to prove Kotal Anzad's plea for defense and suddenly a record of outrage was revealed. Since there was a dead body, it was uncovered and the vaginal shrubs of the dead body were stained with the mini-prosecution version, it was not ruled out, expected on the defense version or in complete exempt cases. I was rejected, old 5 300, PPC read with old section 304, PPC was intended to be dealt with under new section 302 (c), under PPC 5302 (6). The accused was found guilty, the PPC was subsequently changed to Section 302 (c), PPC. property advocate from Daur lawyer