Section 9 (b) Prohibition of intoxication Delay in sending samples to test the proof of evidence The possibility of tampering with the property did not produce daily entries from the absence of private witnesses Police allegedly patrolled the accused He was arrested on duty and 200 grams of hashish was recovered from his possession. The trial court sentenced and convicted the offenders under Section 9 (b) of the Narcotic Material Act Control Act 1997. The allegedly recovered chars were sent to the Chemical Examiner with a delay of about 9 days for which no explanation was given as to which records did not show that the marijuana was seized during such intervention. In cases where tampering with the property of a matter cannot be neglected. The suspect was arrested in a densely populated area surrounded by shops and hotels, but no private person was involved because the defendant made a specific request that excise officers were at odds with his father, therefore, the prosecution The real departure from the police records was not submitted to check the location of the freelance persons because the prosecution failed to establish their case against the suspects, without any doubt, the appeal was allowed, The trial court's decision was dismissed and the accused acquitted.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
