Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

CHANESAR versus MUHAKMUDDIN


Section 10 (4) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the cancellation of section 164 land allotment was never proved in the possession of the land and was never tenant, as was section 10 (4) of the Colonization. Was considered under. Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 and there was no right to any land, allotment of land made in favor of the respondents was invalid and the allotment in favor of the respondents was automatically canceled when it was 30 days. Failed to submit the initial within the stipulated period and, receiving some money, 11th respondent, the land could not be restored in favor of it. The land in dispute is the official land, according to the land may be disposed of in an open hatchery. ? Grant policy, provided that no allotment / grant was banned in the Land Utilization Department, and this question was free of all land.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Noshki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.