Find a Lawyer

NADEEM AFZAL versus STATE

202020, 7 337 G and 7 427 were found guilty of payment of payment amount and sentenced as well as payment of diat money which had given sufficient punishment, the legal legacy of the deceased accused was paid. Was not released on dislike of payment of. Exempt from the payment of money, saying that he was living alone in his family and states that he has three daughters. Besides his wife, a son and his family, there was no other bread earner and he could not pay the money according to the defendant's detention charge for not paying the compensation paid for the trial. Was. As the accused had already completed a reasonable sentence, if the accused was released, he might be able to start paying the dues in installments, the state council did not object to such a prediction. In such cases, the accused was ordered to remain subject to his presence. Personal bond equal to the amount of money before the court vows divorce advocates from Garh More lawyer