Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE

Sections 498 and 561 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 ad interim pre-arrest bail, only two of the four accused at the scene, who were absconding, were identified by prosecution witnesses at that time. ? He was also involved in his statements under Section 161, CRPC, which would mean that the present accused were the two unidentified accused. After his arrest, he was apprehended by the prosecution witnesses in the identification parade. , And he was involved thereafter. In their statements under section 164 under, the fourth accused in the PC who was never arrested was named Prima facie, it seems that a malicious conclusion was reached in this regard, however, the trial. The trial can only take place after the evidence is recorded in court. And it cannot be said in the circumstances that this was not evidence in any way to justify the termination of the accused's involvement in the present proceedings. Omar looked suspicious, what fact would he be entitled to bail Miscellaneous petitions were turned into bail pleas and bail was granted before the accused law firms from Khangah Sharif lawyer