Find a Lawyer

ALAM versus STATE

Section 3 (2) (a) of Pakistan Citizenship Act (II of 1951), Section 16 was based in Pakistan with his father accused of illegally entering Pakistan and the accused who was married, his wife and children also The national identity card was issued to the accused resident in Pakistan, but the trial court failed to appreciate the document, the trial court did not even appreciate the fact that the accused's father had filed his B-form. I named the suspect as one of my minor children. The said documents are important and cannot be neglected or neglected by any explicit remarks and other documents were not well appreciated by the trial court and were ignored only after 1983. Were related to the Relevant authorities attach the assumption that certain materials or inquiries are based on law based on official proceedings or documents unless such OT is proved, such documents could not be considered purposeless only. These documents were issued after 1983, although of Bengali origin, but only for the fact that they were granted legal status as a citizen of Pakistan under Section 16 of the Act. (A), the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951, if he had been in Pakistan before 1975, the father of the father accused of illegally entering Pakistan was not particularly weighty when he submitted supporting documents. So the evidence presented by the accused was more convincing than the evidence presented by the prosecutor. The accused did not deserve to be punished. best advocate from Burewala lawyer