Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMED versus ABDUL AZIZ

Sections 3, 4, 5 and 9 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), Sections 110 and 561 against the direct dismissal of the complaint were sought by the applicant / complainant in the questioning order approved by the session judge, under which The complaint filed directly by the complainant was excluded on the basis of Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, since the application of the criminal code of conduct under section 9 of this Act has been extended. The complaint of 1898 should be withdrawn by the magistrate in support of the provisions of section 190 (3), CRPC. According to Section 4 (1) of the Illegal Disposition Act, 2005, the applicant's complaint on the basis of the jurisdiction of the Session Judge, under the provisions of the said Act, being exclusively heard by a court session. Error in rejecting The option to be taken seriously in connection with offenses under the provisions of the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005 was specially formulated in the Sessions Court, Section 9090, while rejecting the application of the CCPC to the Court of Session. For the special mandate, the use of offenders under the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005: The courts should pay special attention and try to use the offenders: Courts as post office. The wisdom of legislative complaints could not be attributed to the provisions of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, which should be entertained directly by the Court of Sessions complaint filed under the provisions of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005 There will be no need to resign by the Magistrate. Section 1 (90 (2)), the PCP Impeachment Order was set aside and the trial core top advocates from Dargai lawyer