Find a Lawyer

PIR BUX versus MUHAMMAD MOOSA

Section Re: Revenue of Sindh Revenue Jurisdiction Act (X of X 19076), Section 11 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11 Civil Suit Trial Rejection of Jurisdiction, in the present case, the claimant's determination Without, Revenue officials banned. The pending claim had also included suit land in the schedule for the purpose of auction, and in fact the defendant had been granted the same, in the circumstances the open assembly should have asserted its rights because the conditions, including the heirs. The statements should include consideration of persons with legal rights in approving public lands; in fact, the plaintiffs themselves claimed in the claimant's claim that they had suits contained in section 36 on the land bar. Were the rights of the Colonial Land (Punjab) Act, 1912 as well as the Sindh Revenue Georgia Act, 1876. Section 11 was fully implemented, as part of the Revenue Authority's action to include suit land in the schedule. For the purpose of the grant / auction was not illegal, neither the quorum was illegal, nor did any jurisdiction nor the plaintiffs have been heard for this matter since the public issue was issued regarding the settlement of the suit on which They ignored such action. The revision / appeal before the Revenue Authorities suit filed by the plaintiffs was withheld by law and the defendant in the circumstances, thus the civil court correctly rejected it. famous supreme court advocate from Kot Addu lawyer