Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL HAQ AND OTHERS versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 17 Letter No. 1841 C, Date 28 4 1932 Exchange of State Land with Private Land Past and closed transaction effect land on which the appellant's rights were granted in the possession of the State Land in the possession of the Agriculture High Court. Happened to Upon review of the order of exchange of appeals by the authorities under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the Commissioner, without reviewing the order, approved without prejudice that the state land was not exchanged. Could have Along with the proprietary rights of private lands acquired by appellant thirteen years ago and also in favor of them, the affirmation was confirmed and the registered rights were closed to the sons and the previous transaction was not again with the Commissioner. Open without a Lux Standby that was misused. And he was never commissioned for the unlawful use of powers, er violated the instructions in letter No. 1841C, dated 28 4 1932, which made it clear that once the grantor owned the rights. So, no application for transfer could have been applied if the land had not been allotted in favor of the appellants. Through the grant, even then the State Department of Agriculture could not be transferred to private land, the property rights granted to the appellant commissioner were ignored that only the state land could be exchanged for state land. Therefore, it was passed by this order that they violated Section 17 of the Public Land Colonial Law (Punjab) Act, 1912. Supreme Court directs authorities to wa top civil advocates from Jhudo lawyer