Article 199 Termination of Constitutional Procedure Civil and criminal proceedings The controversial determination justification questioned the respondent's request for inquiry proceedings initiated by the Anti-Corruption Establishment, which was the basis of the material presented before the High Court could not intervene. Was finalized on. Investigative Practices conducted by the Investigation Agency may resolve the disputed question because of a commitment to verification or any other allegation that could not be resolved by the High Court in this constitutional jurisdiction because the matter was finally resolved. The Revenue Authority, so the action taken by the Anti-Corruption Establishment was not endorsed, it had no power Revenue authorities could not in any way determine a person's criminal responsibility , Based on material collected by the mall. Investigative Agency; This basic argument was considered a crime; the second argument, which is primarily civil in nature, was that the continuation of the proceedings by the Investigation Agency was unnecessary; Simultaneously, criminal proceedings can proceed as well. Both are related to different laws and can be established simultaneously.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
