AKBAR versus STATE
By complimenting the evidence of Section 2 (2 (b)), the complainant had presented a detailed, careful and consistent account of the incident and his integrity could not be diminished in the examination of his integrity because the complainant's testimony was merely It cannot be ruled out that the liar was the brother of the deceased.The complaining party was not charged that he had any enmity with the accused and that he had no valid reason to dismiss him. The solemn statement of a witness affected by the trust and confidence was sufficient to provide the ocular account presented by the complainant to the home. According to the medical report, the motive and recovery of the firearm from the accused, which is in the work order, cannot be excluded because of the evidence against the accused because of the aforementioned evidence. Can't be heard, and was acquitted The trial court did not face any legal defect not to read the material evidence In the circumstances the conviction and sentence of the perpetrators were retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Karak lawyer
