Find a Lawyer

AMJAD NAWAZ versus D.P.O. DISTRICT LODHRAN

Sections 9379, 202020, 6406, 6506, 9489F and 111111 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution, revealed the termination of the allegedly executed FIR contract by the applicant. That the applicant was not mentioned in the FIR allegedly issuing any kind of check. According to the FIR, a rental car was obtained and the security gave the respondents a check of Rs.400,000, but this fact was not compromised as the deal was only after 2000 km of the party. There will be mention. Be responsible for using the oil from your pocket. That the vehicle will be rented for a month and the rent for the month will be Rs 22,000, in which case, the complainant was not proved by the applicant to supply the complaint, the matter with which the agreement was between the parties. Came in its scope. Citizens' responsibility was clearly shown by the complainant's Mala Mala duties, together with the two retired D-section P's, immediately adding different provisions to the FIR to the complainant's The rumors were also revealed. FIR was filed under Section 9999F, PPC. It seems that the complainant had the habit of filing FI rupees on a similar story to blackmail the public to get the money and it did not appeal to the mind when the car rent was Rs. The day was and the price of the new car was not more than Rs.300,000, how the applicant was immediately presented to issue a check for Rs. Applicant's constitutional door to abolish property advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer