Find a Lawyer

MST. SHEHNAZ AKHTAR versus FIDA HUSSAIN

Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application by the jurisdiction and limitation of the Family Court jurisdiction for the recovery of Dover, dowry articles and the grant of restitution allowance against the husband and his father. The more essential parties were fixed according to the amount of strings immediately and resolved as Rs. 60,000, of which the plaintiff was allowed to obtain a plot of five marbles with an adjoining room. On the basis of which was transferred from the husband's father in her favor, in return the indoor amount of Rs 40,000 was the remaining amount of Rs 20,000 of Taurus gold jewelry. Which was handed over to her and the question arose whether the plaintiff could sue the bride for the completion of the contract rather than the bride for payment of the bride, there was no one in the plaintiff's way in this regard. There is no restriction or prohibition, so that the claim of execution and completion of the contract will hinder the plaintiff's way. Under the Family Court, Section, West Pakistan Family Court Act, 6464 Act j had the exclusive jurisdiction to entertain, hear and decide the matters set forth in Part I of the Schedule to the Act and any restrictions therein. Was not done while only claiming to take the bride from the husband / husband could be prosecuted for the recovery of the duel and no one else if the other person was standing on bail or he was guaranteed to pay the indoor It could be applied legally under a duty guarantee and a guaranteed guarantee. The bride is responsible for paying because she herself is the groom. les r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Dunyapur lawyer