Find a Lawyer

IMRAN SIKANDAR versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/109/148/149 bail, FIR of doubtful benefit was filed with a delay of four and a half hours, the accused was neither named in the FIR nor The name of the complainant was included in the names, in the presence of the complainant's additional statement and how it was discovered about the fact that the complainant then made conspiracy the night before the incident. No specific role was attributed to the accused after recording the evidence, the recovery of the rifle from the accused was unusual as no crime was sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory for comparison because the accused was charged with a crime. There was no reasonable basis for linking. One of the further inquiries was extended to the accused on benefit and accordingly he was admitted on bail. tax advocates from Jhudo lawyer