Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

The petitioner, who was the complainant in the case, in the petition for the re-examination of Section 4040 & 1 P1 witnesses alleged that when the statements of the prosecution witnesses were recorded, the trial reader, who Evidence was recorded, was brought on record incorrectly at the time of the incident, the accused was armed with Swati while the witnesses specifically stated that the accused was rejected by the trial court at the relevant time and he too. Submitted in the review, the petitioner challenged that the applicant had issued the orders. It was submitted that the petitioner's complaint would be resolved; if he was allowed to pass the petition before the trial court for re-examination, then both witnesses said that the witnesses were allowed by the High Court. The trial court will decide the matter after hearing both. Witnesses immigration advocates from Nilam lawyer