Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus STATE

Pre-arrest bail, section 498 HC (XLV of 1860), section 337 H (ii) / 379/427/506/148/149, denial of an accused who belonged to the occupation group was named in the FIR And was attributed to a specific character. He was involved in a large number of criminal cases registered at several police stations and appeared to be committing criminal activities or the complaining police were not shown any misconduct against the accused, in appropriate cases. The exception to the bail may be denied, although it does not fall under the prohibited clause of section 494 (1), the CCP Investigation Officer found the defendant guilty of serious harm to the accused. The tractors were seized. And the overbearing manner tried to intimidate, intimidate, and arrest the complaining party, so that no one could dare to act against their wishes in the realm of influence. As in the circumstances, the accused is not allowed \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocates contact from Kasur lawyer