Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ BASHIR WARRAICH versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL

25 and 71 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Election Tribunal challenged by parties relying on R2 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005, to order direct re-polling: only one polling To deal with the Returning Officer's authority at the station where the polling station was interrupted / interrupted, reasons beyond the control of the presiding officer or the ballot boxes were taken into custody of the presiding officer or accidentally destroyed. Were / were deliberately or ballot papers destroyed / tampered with. Reliance on 25 was not only unnecessary but was also misplaced in the circumstances, Rule 25 did not give the Election Tribunal the power to vote directly at any and all polling stations without any restriction, if on the basis of evidence. Be indispensable. The parties' claim on the file clearly shows that some ballot papers were indeed recaptured at one of the polling stations. Nothing was done in the presence of the parties by the Election Tribunal. 23S ballot papers were found missing in the election tribunal; On the basis, the Election Tribunal was to announce the respondents. Since the returning candidates had no power as the selection of the applicant / returning candidates was not canceled by the Election Tribunal and after the re-polling at the polling station, the Returning Officer in the form XV records fresh. Will produce a unanimous statement and n law firms from Pindi Bhattian lawyer