Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus FARAZ AHMED

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), application for cancellation of section 489F bail, the order of bailment went on technicalities only and there was no mention of the respondents / accused's action. ? Referred to the trial court, which approved the bail under section 499F, PPC, although it did not attract the section 497 (1), CRPC prohibited clause. But just the fact that the prohibition clause was not drawn, the accused would not be against it. Became entitled to bail The accused had the credibility of renewing his actionable action which he had presented to a court of competent jurisdiction, and thereafter, under sections 22A and 22B, C An application was filed under RPC, CRPC did not press its request. Accepting a defendant's bail under the circumstances for the criminal case to be registered will be equivalent to taking advantage of his fraud. Approval of the bail was at its discretion, which cannot be exercised. A man who approached the court in a haughty way, the trial court canceled his arrest warrant for the accused. \ r \ n pakistani advocates Dinga lawyer