Find a Lawyer

MAHMOOD AHMED versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER

Sections 20, 20A and 68 previously granted naka approval and new jurisdiction of the canal authorities, the defendant's request for approval of the new naka was granted by the Nahal authorities, the plaintiff in the case of granting new naka. Had challenged the claim in keeping with this order. The canal was obtained from the defendant's association with the authorities, so an illegal suit was ordered but the order was set aside in the appeal. The authorities of the Valdetti Canal have the authority to review the parties' place and notices before deciding the matter, unless the civil court can use the discretion at the discretion under the canal. And a special law of the Drainage Act, 1873, that was unlawful, arbitrary, or to some extent the result of or misappropriation of powers, a legal jurisdictional error in the operation of the authorities, or the benefits or alleged morals on the record record. Militancy was established Naka was required in question about the metal road and that was the approval after the complete investigation of the tune did not apply the provisions of Section 6868 ()) as no new Naka was approved. The material was not identified as illegal or illegal, the application was dismissed in circumstances. property advocates from Shorkot lawyer