Find a Lawyer

MST. FATIMA BIBI versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, SARGODHA

Article Q 42 The Law of Martyrs (of 10 of 1984), Article 100 Suite which was declared a document of thirty years old was a vacant property and was originally allotted to the common ancestors of the parties. It was said that he passed away before the transfer was made. The surviving parties 'widows and the defendants' forefathers withdrew from their rights / surrendered in favor of the former defendant through the widow and two sons. The disputed shop was therefore transferred to the former person under a permanent transfer proceeding by the plaintiff. Which was challenged by the plaintiffs on the basis of deception The plaintiff's claim for title in the disputed shop was allowed by the trial court but was dismissed by the appellate court before the plaintiff's predecessor through the settlement authorities. The petitioner filed a consent to the transfer of the property against the defendants, with an agreement in this regard, affidavit and certified copies of 19 documents supporting the PTD, which is linked to the age of the document and the fact that is about. Plaintiffs were unable to transfer professionals 13 years after the PTD issuance, but did not attempt to challenge defendant's transfer in favor of defendants during his life, said material evidence. Suitable for the court finding that defendants were released. Unable to prove their claim best law firm from Musafir Khana lawyer