BAHADAR KHAN THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus ABDUL GHANI THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Declaration of Sale of Endorsement approved in 1948 in favor of the defendant's predecessor by the plaintiff's predecessor in section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 42 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872). Records have not been processed Since 1948, the defendant's predecessor's name appeared as a mortgage and the defendant, not as the owner, presented the case mutation in the evidence, but he did not consider the suit mutation as an issue. No evidence has been produced regarding the trial and the appellate court granted legal justification for the original jamboree for the year 1947 1947 48 48 which was passed by the High Court. In column 13, it was shown that the insertion of the suit mutation in red ink looks fresh and more luminous than the entries of the other mutations, so that the inscription in relation to the suit mutation was different from the other. The dilapidated cousin showed the plaintiff as a mortgagee rather than the plaintiff as the owner of the suit land, but Cis upheld the concurrent decree of the courts under the High Court, which in the circumstances dismissed the request for review. n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
