MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus MUHAMMAD MANSHA
The Section 10 Contract Act (IX of 1872), section 65 suit for possession, affirmed that the plaintiff received cash and gold jewelry in addition to cash to pretend to marry the plaintiff but could not be married, even before the plaintiff. Found. Plaintiffs' lawsuit was filed under Sections 202020 and 640 Criminal, PPC after which the defendant allegedly agreed under the agreement to fulfill the plaintiff's claim but failed to do so, the appeal. The suit was ordered and affirmed, concluding that the fact finding that the cash, clothes and gold jewelry were exchanged hands and never returned to the plaintiff proved unenforceable. It was believed that the agreement was invalid, violating public policy was not enforceable, it had no power because the agreement was obtained under section 65 of the Act, 1872 Was responsible for returning all the benefits of the invalid contract
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer
