Find a Lawyer

DR. SYED TARIQ SOHAIL versus PAKISTAN DFFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY (D.H.A.) THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR

Section title42 title Announcement of title figures Additional land suit property in the possession of the plaintiffs' property described by the houses and boundaries was leased to the plaintiff in interest of the plaintiffs throughout the year, on all four sides of the Society's property. And the defendants purchased this property. The year, 1995 and before purchase, three site plans were approved for the building, the first project had a suite property area of 2000 square yards, while in the later plans, the area was 2600 square yards, after the purchase of the suite property. , Plaintiffs applied for a change, but the authorities declined to change the property by their names on the basis that the definition of suit property was 3728 square yards instead of 2600 square yards, authorities increased the occupancy of the plaintiffs. The present value of the land was sought because the suit property was located within the limits stated in the lease deed and site plans, therefore, size or area. A dispute about this was finalized. The material was sold to the entire land leased in addition to the limitations set forth in the site plan. Authorities failed to prove that the plaintiff or his client was being abused on additional land. Cannot indicate the existence of any additional. Had all the rights to retain all the pieces of land and parcels within the boundaries described in the lease, it could be 2600 square yards or 3728 square yards recorded by the authorities intentionally, rightly extended or by mistake Calculated the area of land. At the time of leasing the foreclosure in the interest of the plaintiffs, 2600 square yards of additional land instead of its original area was 3728 square yards. property advocate from Chakwal lawyer