Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI

Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Plot Allotment Claims That Applicant Claimed Transfer Of Underlying Plot, Which He Was Buying From His Original Allottee Real Allottee Deposited The Plot And Development Authority , Had issued a site plan and order of occupancy, after which, through the applicant, the attorney had already applied for the transfer of the lease by the aforesaid plot petitioner, which was allowed and the amount required for the transfer by the applicant. / The fee was paid, after the transfer stated that the applicant has received a letter of development authority It stated that the plot was canceled due to illegal deposit of commercial value, noting that the bank's paid challan was a fake document and that the amount was ever deposited by the original Altiz with the concerned bank. Did not The constitutional application was accepted by the applicant and ordered to retain the status of consent which was complied with by the Development Authority Petitioner. The order, disputed with the High Court case, was dispatched to the Director General, Development Authority for a qualifying decision after the applicant's fraudulent hearing, if any, on public notice of the original altimet being passed. The source was condolenced and in several other cases, several plots were canceled. The same land was restored to the allotment on payment of their occupancy cost even though it was willing to pay, but it was approved by the development authority. Did not accept, under controversial matters, the applicant, m famous lower court advocate from Samundri lawyer