Find a Lawyer

BABER SHEIKH versus STATE

Section 16 (3) Criminal Procedure (V of 1898), Section 561 Leasing a company financing leasing / reclaiming by a leasing company agent, recovering / re-occupying the car Before taking action. No notice or notice on the lease was given by any leasing company or its agents, nor was the opportunity paid to the alleged lender on any reasonable opportunity, so both the leasing company and its agents The action was utterly blatant on the side and they were wrong. Direct power to be used to recover the Lease Article under Section 16 (3) (a), Financial Institution (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, for the lease under section 16 (3) of section 16 of the Ordinance Petition. ). Terminating the proceedings under Section 615A, the CCP was dealt with by the High Court, setting the magistrate's order to some extent, however, the High Court observed that the situation was unfolding in the petition. It was annoying because a company or company could not be authorized to take the law on its own right without notice: for example, if there was any resistance offered by the borrower / customer, Can cause serious problems. To address this matter, the matter should be referred to the Provincial Home Secretary and see to what extent the rehabilitation force may be applied in such cases and if any unpleasant incident is brought about by any party and iii. Who will be responsible if it comes? The role and excuse of the Police Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan were also directed. tax advocates from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer