Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SAUDI PAK COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus MESSRS MARVI AGROCHEM (PRIVATE) LTD.

Sections 9, 10, and 14 based on the claim for leave to defend the plaintiff in the case of debt collection by the bank, false debit entries were neither taken on leave to defend the application and Not on argument. The bank, along with its affidavit, filed a detailed account statement. The account statement shows the debit entries for the finance company, which the bank receives from time to time and credit payments to the bank. After adjusting the payments, a fixed amount was left as outstanding and the amount was without markup events and a markup claim was filed from time to time in the High Court for charging the markup. Important debit entries for were displayed. Amount based on the amount actually received and payments made by the plaintiff company appearing in the debit and credit entries in which none of the debit entries were misidentified by the plaintiff company. Defense leave was applied for a certain amount of money against the defendants with the cost of the funds, with compensation at the approved rates of the State Bank, and so on until the full unannounced amount was recovered. Yes, it was ordered to recover the first mortgage to be imposed through the sale of the property. The value of the defendant company and the mortgaged property was not sufficient to cover the undisclosed amount, then before the recovery was made from the assets of the other defendants \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firms from Daud Khel lawyer