Find a Lawyer

MST. ANISA BEGUM versus ATIQ-UR-REHMAN

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 96 Limitation Appeal Period Calculation Not to be issued by copy of branch for submission of certified copy decision and the trial court passed the order dated 29-3 2004, certified A copy was requested on 31 3. 2004, the cost was submitted on 12th 2004 and the copy was submitted on 24th 2004 2004 The Appeal Court dismissed the appeal of the restriction submitted by the applicant for the receipt of the copy certified copy. Did not issue any notice, therefore, the time limit shall be in accordance with the date from the date of section 12 (5) of the accuracy of the copy of the Act, 1908, provided that it is excluded only from the time period provided by law. That it was necessary to obtain copies that the applicants did not file any copy receipt. Indicate whether a date was given to him for collecting the copy, so, the date mentioned by the copywriter in the judgment was correct if the period was calculated, then the appeal was filed on 22 22 2004. Made, before the Appellate Court was granted a 20-day ban by the applicant due to further delay in the submission of the copy cost and the receipt of the certified copy. Not excluded from the time limit provided under 512 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the appellate court properly dismissed the appeal and in the jurisdiction of the review, the High Court refused to interfere with the decision, dismissing the review. Was done criminal advocate from Gujrat lawyer