ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, DISTRICT BHAKKAR
Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 9 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), in the joint holding of the plaintiff's declaration for the declaration in section 42 South on the basis of the right of 400 Kanal inheritance and the defendant's statement Land. In the Revenue Record against the specific measles number instead of sharing in the joint holding of the plaintiff's land by the Land Commission, as mentioned in the document form mentioned in the declaration form filed by the respondent under the Conformity Act 1977, Implementation of The plaintiff's joint ownership suit existed in the land prior to the adoption of such a declaration dated 25 197 1974, that is, long before the issuance of the Land Reforms Act 1977, such decree declared a share in the joint property, but not the revenue. Authorities approved a change of corruption against his spirit. The Land Commission had no jurisdiction to investigate or to overturn the decision under which the plaintiff's joint ownership rights in this case were declared in civil court. It will have no jurisdiction, if given by the Land Commission under the Land Reforms Act, 1977, but otherwise the impugned order passed by the Land Commission would have no jurisdiction, therefore, the Civil Court would have In this case, the jurisdiction to entertain was circumstantial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
