Find a Lawyer

NASIR ABBAS SHERWANI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, DIRECTORATE-GENERAL OF IMMIGRATION, PASSPORT OFFICE, HEADQUARTERS, ISLAMABAD

The R5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 5 Civil Service Regulations (C Section R) Vol. I, Reg. 194 suspension appeals against which criminal cases were registered, were approx. Continued suspended for a period of the year. Authority and suspension made effective The Authority argued that the appellant's suspension for several years was sufficiently legal and valid as it was in accordance with Regulation 194 of the Civil Service Regulations, which required repeated approval of the competent authority. do not have. It was held under suspension because the Civil Service Regulations Rule 194, which did not invalidate the rules of public servants (competence and discipline), was invalid in view of the applicant's suspension under the 1973 law. Because the Appellant's suspension period which should initially be for three was not extended every three months under the R5 of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, with the approval of the competent authority and The appellant was continuously suspended for a period of about six years without approval. The appellant's competent authority was obliged to keep the suspension separate and to treat the duty with all back benefits. An executive order cannot be made as effective as it was in the appellant's case. The ineffective order was set aside in the direction of the result of dealing with the appellant on duty for the entire duration of his suspension. With derivative benefits top civil advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer