REHMATULLAH versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Rr 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5 and 6 Service Tribunals Act (XX of 1973), removal of Section 4 promissory appellant was removed from the job after issuing show cause notice, but under charge Without holding a grudge against them. Employees related to misappropriation and theft of funds were fined a great deal of expulsion, not only by holding inquiries against them, but also for personal hearings without issuing a final showcase notice about the proposed punishment and the appellant. The opportunity was not There was evidence to support the allegations against the appellant on the basis of which he was removed from the job.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Liaquat Pur lawyer