Find a Lawyer

SYED ANWAR ALAM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 2 (b), 3 (1) and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Disappearance of the Disappearance Service after issuing the show cause notice to the appellant and investigating them against the appellant Was imposed. Appellant filed an appeal against an unacceptable order passed against him by the appellant on the grounds of wrongdoing and misconduct and some charges of the commission, which were within the rule of law and did not reach the appellant's office. Was in the habit of being rude, tough and disrespectful. Appellant appears to have begun to deduct his salary for the first installment of the advance of the home building and to receive the advance of the second building of the house, without completely eliminating the total amount of advance of the first home building. Made a mistake That the appellant failed to initiate deductions for the Advancement of the first house building nineteen received the second advance in a timely manner and without completely eliminating the first advance, believing that there was no financial loss, however. The government has suffered this loss, the inquiry officer did not necessarily charge other than to impose a large retirement penalty. In the circumstances, the appellant was not compliant with the crime, it is said that the punishment is very severe, it was responsible for reducing Major penalty bf mandatory retirement was reduced to two years to stop the increase. ? lawer from fb area from Raiwind lawyer