Find a Lawyer

FLT. LT. FARRUKH RASHID versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 5 and 11 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appointment Termination of Appeal Service Applying the principle of locus positivity to appellant as A-section P was not challenged and Nor was any future development documented, indicating the appointment letter issued to the appellant. The fact that there was no protest against his appointment from any official quarter, including the Federal Public Service Commission, allowed the appellant to complete his training and qualify for the Final Passing Exam, organized by the Federal Public Service Commission. Was gone 7 from 2003 to 31 3 2005, when it was terminated on the basis of the principle of Lux Positivity and on the basis of any error, but seeking the Principal of Lux Poverty and continuing to work on the consolidation of the law as per the terms. Got their right. Under the docket under SCMR 1128 of 2003, the appointment was valid and was affirmed and endorsed by the Law Division and the Attorney General, in the case of termination of the appellant, in these circumstances illegal and fair. Which violated the principle of luxuriousness. With the benefit of all the results, from the date of the unwarranted order, the appellant will be subject to an affidavit that he was not profitably employed during the intervention. best advocate from Peshawar lawyer