Find a Lawyer

ASHFAQ AHMAD versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Section 2 (AA), 3, 5 and 10 penalties apply to appeal to the service tribunal, prevent mitigation, warning and restriction on any significant administrative responsibility, negligence / inability to perform duty on the appellant. Was charged under the charge. The allegations against the appellants against violating the law and regulations were that an officer of the bank's branch had at that time served as the sub-manager and chief manager, his superiors did not exercise proper control. What was Negligence and it did not apply to the bank's rules which stated that the officer would continue his activities and the unnecessary disciplinary action against the appellants was a gross violation of the law as the Appeal Committee informed the appellants of the charges. Was not done And show cause notices under section 3 of removal from service (special power) O. Ordinance, 2000, by the unqualified authority fact, was also issued to the appellants that the proceedings against the appellants were in violation of the law, invalid order against the appellants. Enough to decide, the appellate order was set aside, the authority will have the freedom to act on de novo. Action against appeals in accordance with the provisions of the law within a specified period patent advocate from Pasni lawyer