KHALID AKHTAR versus CHAIRMAN, WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE
Section 11A [as inserted Video Civil Servants (Amendment) Ordinance (XX of 2001)] and 12 Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 4 Reversal Appellant Appointed Appealing Surplus Was tortured and posted against approval. On the lower posts the appellants had pleaded that the authority had absolutely no power to return them to their lower positions. Appellants also claimed that despite vacant vacancies, they were returned to lower posts, further disputing the appellants that they were subjected to discrimination. Many of the employees who were juniors were allowed to remain in their original positions. While they were senior, the grant of section 11A of the Civil Servants Act 1973 was abolished. The authority was given so many powers. Were to integrate higher level employees into the same grade or to the same rank in iii lower party positions on the absence of vacant posts, since the salaries of the more employees were safe, the authority ies had no law or rule in returning the appellant authorities. Was not violated, in the circumstances. Appellant had the power to post against lower party positions Appellant's allegations that he was posted against lower positions despite vacant posts and that his juniors were not returned and that he was senior. Returned, the respect for the required consideration and appeals can be resolved by the authorities to present evidence to prove that vacant posts existed and their juniors were promoted, Authorities
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
