MUHAMMAD ARIF versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE
Appeal to RR 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, R21. Service Tribunal dismissed. Appellant did not have the right to a personal hearing when he took away the passengers without a ticket after issuing showcase notices and allegations against him, and in fact he was investigated. Due to this, he was sentenced to a heavy dismissal. In violation of the rules and regulations, which was in the form of a question and answer, it was stated that in view of these weaknesses, the order for removal of sanction against the appellant was set aside and ordered to be restored to the service authority. Under which he can initiate new proceedings against the appellant in accordance with law. Specific duration
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Lalamusa lawyer
