Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSOOR SHAHZAD versus CONTROLLER-GENERAL OF ACCOUNTS, ISLAMABAD

Section 8 and 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Seniority Promotion Disclaimer Appellant was appointed Auditor General of Pakistan as Apprentice Accountant (B 16), in accordance with the terms and conditions which were in the Applicant's appointment letter. Included, they were needed. The appellant, who could not be eligible for the examination in the specified three attempts, applied for another opportunity to pass the Section A Section Examination, but instead of applying for it, the Accountant General of Pakistan, whose office I was allotted the Appellant, terminated his services as a Trustee. Accounts Officer, but at the same time he was appointed as Senior Auditor (B11), after the appellant was terminated, some of his colleagues who also made three chances to finish the Section A Section Exam. They were given another opportunity to approve the appellant thereafter in accordance with the terms of the Section A Section Examination Appointment, upon entering the PR application, the Tribunal decided that the probationer accountants had a history of joining this section. Seniority will be awarded instead of being eligible for the Section A Section Examination Controller. Following the advice of the Establishment Division, in the public accounts, orders for appellant's salary and seniority of apprentices / probationer accountants were issued on 8 2 2003, instead of clearing them for the second section to clear the section A section examination. He was treated unfairly rather than given the opportunity. His services were terminated by the Ineligible Authority, which did not appoint the Authority Appellant, yet qualified and as an Assistant Accounts Officer immigration advocates contact from Barkhan lawyer