Find a Lawyer

IRZA PHARMA (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus MONOPLY CONTROL AUTHORITY

Non-issuance of general or special injunctions appealing penalty of sections 2 (l) (m), 7, 11, 12, 19 and 21 under the provisions of the Appellant Monopoly and Section 2 (l) (M) of the Conducted Business Practices. Was a contract. Control and Prevention (Ordinance) ? Monopoly Monopoly Authority in Mon 1970 Mon asked for some information from appellant but did not obtain required information Monopoly and compulsory trading practices (control and prevention) Ordinance, 1970 1970 under Under the penalty imposed under the Sun Val 1970 Val Valid, the Validity Authority may demand it. Son providing information on its activities, its organization, business. Monopoly and Restricted Business Practices (Control and Prevention) Trade practice and management by a general order approved under section 7 of the Ordinance, 1970, or a special order or any order in the terms of sections 11 and 12, special or general. Was never approved nor conveyed to the appellant. Under no order, monopoly and restrained trade practices (control and containment) against monopolies could not be proceeded under the terms of section 19 of the Ordinance, 1970, under which the authority could be fined by the appellant. Under which the monopoly and sanctions proceedings were punished. The Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970, which had to be strictly construed and should not be used to arbitrarily punish those operations in the event of a conflict, justified the dispute between the parties. Was not stopped and the whole matter was not considered. As canvassed by the monopolist before the monopoly property advocate from Kotmomin lawyer