HAFIZ MIAN MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR UNION COUNCIL NO.54 USMAN KOREA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT MUZAFFARGARH
In the R65 Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 intra-court petitioned the appellants, who challenged the selection of the respondents, filed a petition demanding that their claim be counted only to the extent of voting. And will not put pressure on other places. The Election Tribunal, in its election petition, granted the constitutional petition to the respondents, allowing the petitioner's application stating that the constitutional petition filed by the respondents had been directed by the Election Tribunal High Court, The Election Tribunal will decide the election petition according to law appeals. An intra-court appeal was filed against the High Court's decision, which claimed that the directive against the interim order of the Election Tribunal for counting of votes was ineligible and deserved to be excluded on the basis that it was correct. Yes, it was not the case of the respondents whose order was approved. By the Election Tribunal either the CTR was subject to no jurisdiction without authorization or the maximum jurisdiction was granted. The Election Tribunal has issued a formal injunction with jurisdiction in the constitutional petition. Neither can it be challenged, which deserves to be excluded on this short ground. In view of the intra-court appeals and the constitutional constitution, the petitioners filed by the respondents were dismissed on account of their incompetence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
