Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUNAWAR HUSSAIN

Section 6A6A Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 6/7/8/9 (c) / 14/15/16 The entire trial property was directed by the trial court to weigh 9013kg. Be presented before the straw in court. The accused, who was allegedly found in the customs house estate, was transferred to the trial under section 1616A, CRPC, for permission to obtain samples from the substance recovered during the trial. Was instructed to furnish the property for all the matter before it. The production of 9013kg of poppy straw at the date of each and every court hearing with the prosecution's witnesses could cause serious problems and inconvenience to the state legislature, allowing such a situation to be addressed in a sure way. Section 1616A will be taken by the incorporation of the CRPC, even otherwise, the record shows that the case property was prepared in the pre-trial proceedings. ? N Court was shown as P1 while recording the PW1 statement, the accused were unable to show if any prejudice would be dealt with by allowing them to take samples, especially when they recovered. Denied the possession or possession of the stranded straw. The trial court's insistence on the preparation of a pile of straw in the court on every date of hearing will negate the purpose of section A16 AA, the CCPC trial court order was discriminated and permission to take state samples The application for the case was transferred before the trial court accepted the appeal accordingly. advocate for immigration from Burewala lawyer