Find a Lawyer

WALAYAT versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was the extraordinary and opportunistic testimony regarding the two witnesses presented by the prosecutor, who failed to obtain any free association or support. Could know how and why he was present at the scene. At the relevant time, the FIR had proved that the prosecution witness had not witnessed any shootings by the accused party himself and, on reaching the scene of the incident, was dropped by the complaining party. Both the witnesses presented by the witnesses were found to be false no matter the fact that both the complainant and the prosecution witnesses had made significant improvements to the trial court in connection with their prosecution against various accused and His statements contradict his earlier statements to police complainant and prosecutor's witnesses. It was done. In addition to the police, the trial court, made before the trial court, failed to explain the location of any injuries to any of the injured or injured persons, both said that witnesses were already against the four co-accused in the trial. Was denied, against whom the eyewitnesses accused of effective participation in the main event. A convicted murderer and had already served a life sentence before the incident, one of the prosecutor's witnesses was involved in several murder cases, saying the witnesses could not be trusted without finding a free trial. That had no existence. According to the case, guns and rifles were recovered from the accused, but no crime was recovered from the scene. immigration advocates from Multan lawyer