Find a Lawyer

SALEEM AHMED versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER

Sections 10 and 12 Ex-Service Order Service two Approval of the order before the expiry of the limitation period for filing of leave for the defense of the suit bank, which sued two persons, before filing a case He had died while others were not served. According to the provisions of Section 10 (2) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, the report date of the process of 2001 was 10 10 2005, while the case was tried on 20 10 2005 and the same day, the trial was already being conducted. Was excluded from The petition filed by the defendant for rejecting the previous order was rejected by the banking court. The application for leave for defense was to be filed under section 10 (2) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Financing) Ordinance 2001. By no means did the banking court of the first service fail to mention any such date of service, even if it was deemed that the defendant was alive and was present, because of this action, his defeat The plaintiffs in the case had thirty days to apply for leave to defend, when the banking court approved the order, yet defendants had 27 days to file a leave defense. At that time, the former order without any jurisdiction, the High Court had suspended the former party order. Approved by the banking court and the decision of the case was re-called. The High Court directed the defendants to file a leave application to defend the case within ten days. Accordingly the appeal was allowed \ r \ n immigration advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer