Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHAB AWAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Promotion Supplement Millis Petitioner On December 31, 2006 2006, the Central Selection Board refused to develop in Grade 21 a false statement about the NAB inquiry against the applicant, two issues for the National Accountability Bureau. contain. Although the inquiry against the applicant was dropped and the authority was informed of the closure of the inquiry through NAB's 2006 letter of 2006, the panel of applicants sent to the board did not correct the pro forma. That the NAB letter he had seen and initiated was mistakenly placed in a branch file which was quite different from the case dealing with the applicant's publicity case. Acknowledges serious errors in performance. Heavy but false defamation of official duties by the officers was allowed to inquire into the probability of the applicant's profession. This led to injustice and a feeling of resentment and injustice among the victims. This was the reason that the applicant accused of dishonesty even though negligence and negligence in discharging government work could have led to similar results, but the latter could not. Speculation to affect the authority's actions did not appear to be hostile to the current record, therefore, allegations of misconduct in the petition were dismissed, accusing the authority of absence of fitness in promotion. Was under judicial scrutiny. Facing the Board due to a misrepresentation of its service record property advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer