Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE

Defining the evidence in section 302 (b), the FIR was immediately lodged in the sentence, which led to the logical conclusion that the prosecution's witnesses were present at the time of the incident when daylight was available. The question of not being was not born. The prosecution's witnesses did not have any serious animosity or unreasonable desire from the accused so that they could include him in a false case. They both gave a credible account of the incident and confirmed each other on all material points, and their statements had the full backing of medical evidence and were confirmed by the recovery of the accused Moto's licensed rifle, Was admitted by the accused himself. Through prosecution, the prosecution had successfully proved its case beyond doubt against the accused, saying that there was no previous illness or rivalry between the victim and the accused and the accused did not repeat the case of fire. Was not sentenced to extreme punishment, was sentenced to life imprisonment with the benefit of the death penalty section 382B, CR PC advocate from Upper Dir lawyer