MUHAMMAD TAHIR MALIK versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, MUZAFFARGARH
Issues in violation of Sections 337A (ii), 337F (i), 337L (ii), 148 and 149 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Investigating the Police Order, 2002 Petitioner, who was named in one of the cases, called on the question in the investigation of his constitutional request made by D-Section P that Article 18 of the Police Order in 2002 ( 6) The applicant claimed in violation of the provisions of. Initially, the local police had investigated the case and it was found to be false and a report on the cancellation of the case had been made, but it was subsequently violated Article 18 (6) of the Police Order 2002. Section P / S: DPO investigated and chalked out petitioner's counsel / accused plea was that DPP had no jurisdiction to investigate the matter without the order of transfer of first inquiry. At the request of the petitioner, the order was passed by the Additional Inspector General of Police under which DPO was directed to investigate the case as per law. Said command has shown that it requested the applicant who made the Police Order was the order in violation of the 2002 Article 18 (6), he succeeded in obtaining a favorable report on the cancellation of the trial. Under police law only the evidence was to be collected and his opinion was neither admissible in the evidence nor the court was obliged to decide the fate of the case before the proceedings in the case where the petition was made. Will be Canceled by Section HO Wag after all your trial and all chances of self defense
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer